managing your personal finance

Mint is a great online service for managing your finances and accounts that together with its accompanying iPhone app boasts a pretty significant 2 million users. While the web-based services are accessible to anyone regardless of what handset they own, users of Mint lacking in the iPhone department had long wondered when they would get to have their cake and eat it too, and it looks like they soon will be able to fill up on the sweet, minty treat.

Ask and though shall receive, as Mint states the upcoming Android version of their application is in direct response to requests from users of the service:

“Customer feedback and requests help determine upcoming products and features from Mint.com. In the coming months, the Mint team plans to address user requests, adding support for thousands of additional financial institutions and an Android application to expand its mobile presence beyond its award-winning iPhone application.”

Some people may not be all that big on the idea of allowing a 3rd party access to your accounts and financial information, but for the many making Mint the #1 personal finance app available, the service is a must-have. Mint allows you to control and track your budget, make adjustments, and view trends and history in your spending. The mobile app gives you quick access to this information wherever you go so you will always know if you have the excess cash for those impulse buys.

I don’t know how I’m doing it, but I’m managing to stay one step ahead of the game around here. I haven’t had to resort to a week of guest posts — yet. Instead, I’ve been working like mad to be sure I have interesting articles for you guys, while also doing my bit to promote Your Money: The Missing Manual. (And, of course, I’ve been living Real Life, too: starting to exercise, and continuing to obsess over The Amazing Race with my wife.)

This post is a quick round-up of a couple of recent things I’ve done, as well as a couple of upcoming events.

Recent events

I did a live webcast last week over at the O’Reilly site. (O’Reilly is the book’s publisher.) Although there’s no archive of the event now, I’m under the impression that there should be one in a week or two. Check back later.

Also, last Friday evening I was a guest on Computer America, which is “American’s longest-running nationally syndicated ratio talk show about computers”. Only, I didn’t talk about computers. Instead, Carey Holzman and I discussed personal finance for an hour. You can listen to an archive of the program via mp3. (And, of course, you can right-click that link to download the file.)

Upcoming events

Here are the two major events I’ve already scheduled:

• I’m joining my pal Chris Guillebeau for a meet-up in Chicago on the evening of Monday, April 5th. Alexandra Levit helped us plan the details: We’ll be gathering at 7pm at Rockit Bar & Grill, which is located across from Wrigley Field. (Man, how I wish the Cubs were playing while I was in town!) I intend to have a few copies of the book, as well as some tasty maple-bacon lollipops to hand out. If you’d like to come hang out with us, RSVP at Chris’ site — and tell him you came from GRS!




• I’ll be giving a talk at Powell’s Technical Books at 7pm on Thursday, April 15th. (Which also happens to be the fourth anniversary of Get Rich Slowly.) I’d love if you came out and gave me some support. I’m a hesitant public speaker, and if there are some friendly folks in the crowd, that’ll give me more confidence!

There’s a chance I’ll be in Washington D.C. at the end of this month, too. I should know more by the middle of next week.

Video contest update

Man, I’m going on blind faith here. The Get Rich Slowly video contest was a big risk, and so far there just aren’t a whole lot of entries. In fact, there are only five of them. That means if the contest ended today, 60% of the entrants would win $500. It also means that your odds are pretty good if you decide to enter.

The latest entry comes from Josh at WalletPop, who compressed his one-hour presentation for college seniors into just 90 seconds! Take a look:

bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson detroit

Careers Employment

How much longer will America's 'gravest recession' last?



Of course, no one knows for sure, but a table produced by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which since 1939 has tracked the increase or decrease in non-farm jobs as reported in its monthly Employer Survey, offers a very cautionary note.



From its post-Great Depression base of 29.2 million, America added 109.6 million non-farm jobs until reaching the peak figure of 138.8 million in 2007. Since December 2007, when this Great Recession started, non-farm payrolls have declined by 11.2 million, and employment overall -- of all types -- has declined by 13.0 million jobs.



Replacing these millions of jobs -- and adding the 140,000 a month needed in order to keep pace with growth in the labor force -- must be our nation's highest priority. And yet, sadly, it isn't.



The White House and Congress seem wildly disconnected from the jobs crisis, perhaps because they spend so much time aiming a strobe light on health care reform, Iraqi elections, a new START treaty, financial industry reform, climate change, an amended No Child Left Behind, Afghanistan and a balanced budget.



The BLS non-farm payroll table offers a focused summary of job creation in the past and a strong sense of what may be possible in the future: America's best three-year job creation total was 10.3 million, which occurred from 1997 to 1999; its second best effort produced 9.4 million jobs between 2004 and 2006; and the third-best performance was 7.7 million new jobs in the years 1984 to 1986.



But America needs to find at least 11.2 to 13.0 million jobs right now just to get us back to December 2007's employment level, which itself was no great shakes, and 22 million new jobs if we want to have, as morally we should, near full real employment. And for every month we delay further, the total increases by 140,000 jobs, which, if measured over three years, would total a further 5.0 million jobs.



Yet not once in seven decades have we ever added more than 10.3 million jobs in three years.



Economists can debate which single 'lever' can best add millions of jobs a year for the next several years but, to date, we have used almost none of the arrows in the nation's job recovery quiver. Meanwhile 18 to 20% of America's workers have been unemployed or extremely underemployed for 27 months. And the levers which we have ignored most consistently are programs modeled after FDR's Works Progress Administration which from 1938 through 1940 employed 5.8 million jobless Americans. That's roughly 17% of the then entire non-farm workforce, a figure comparable to the task confronting our nation today.



This White House and this Congress seem intent on proving that history repeats itself, first as tragedy and then as farce. Their initial jobs programs have been 'missing in action', and their use of phantom 'jobs saved' versus 'real jobs not created' is beyond misleading.



Like the "unemployables" of the Great Depression before FDR came along, America's jobless today face the cruelest of choices: hunger, homelessness and declining heath. And their anxiety and anger are growing even as their hope fades.



But the jobless are not completely destitute in a democracy -- they still own their votes which can be 'spent' on election days or not. And if the BLS total non-farm payroll history is any indication, the jobless will have at least three election cycles -- 2010, 2012 and 2014 -- to spend those votes, and then, as embittered as they will be, theirs will be 'the last (sad) laughs'.



Rick Sloan is Director of Communications of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, and Acting Executive Director of "Ur Union of Unemployed". Ur Union of Unemployed, or UCubed, is a community service project of the IAM that offers the unemployed a way to work together to help end the Great Recession of 2007.

Thanks for your more balanced view on this issue, DCist.

As a 20-something who has left home, tried (and sometimes failed) to make it on her own, and is dealing daily with the worst job market in history in a nation where health care (and other) costs are rising at unprecedented rates (as you point out), I think we at least deserve a fair shake by the media.

In the article, a Brookings Institution representative claims that the relationship has changed between parents and adult children - he also claims that "no one resists or resents it" and "oung people expect it." That's both unfair and untrue. This young person does not expect parental hand outs - and while I may ask for and accept help from time to time, I am under no delusion that my parents are required to give it or do so easily.

I'm not advocating that parents do their children's jobs for them. Certainly we need to address our own professional problems, accept our own failures, articulate our own needs. I regret that adults have to deal with children and parents who feel the behavior mentioned by representatives of Sibley Memorial and the University of Virginia is acceptable and appropriate. I apologize. Yes, our generation has a lot to learn.

But I take heart from the fact that we are interacting with our parents - a far wiser and experienced generation - more than any other group has in history. For some, parents are undoubtedly a crutch. But for me and others like me, my parents are a gift of inspiration and intelligence whose support isn't crippling, inappropriate, or unhealthy. Just because our parents did it on their own doesn't mean that accepting advice or help (especially in new situations with great risk, such as purchasing a home or choosing a college) is to be reproached. My parents DID know the right questions to ask; I'm glad I sought and took their advice.

bobby ferguson's business know bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson's business know bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson's business know bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson's business know bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson's business know bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson's business know bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson's business know bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson's business know bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson's business know bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson's business know bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson's business know bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson's business know bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson's business know bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson's business know bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson's business know bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson's business know bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson's business know bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson's business know bobby ferguson detroit bobby ferguson's business know