Wednesday, September 29, 2010

People Making Money Net


Paul Krugman is on again today about the disappearing middle class, and how the Bush tax cuts are and always have been a huge, unfair giveaway to “the rich,” whoever they are. Because I happen to remember that the Bush tax cuts actually were an across-the-board cut in marginal rates, together with strong reductions in taxes on capital, I wondered how Krugman gets from there to considering them unfair.


Well, of course it’s because high-income people pay more taxes than lower-income people. A LOT more taxes. So any change in marginal rates necessarily affects them more, whether you raise rates or cut them. Clearly enough, Krugman doesn’t have a problem with low tax rates. He has a problem with the fact that some people earn a lot of money.


That got me wondering why we have so much income inequality in the first place. I don’t think there’s one simple answer to that question, but a lot of it comes down to the amount of risk you take.



First, let’s quickly acknowledge a few important things. It’s true that a lack of good education means that millions of unfortunate people have little of worth to trade in return for a good living. That accounts for a lot of inequality at the low end of the scale.


It’s also true that much if not most of the financial industry has shifted from making capital available for investment, to a range of rent-seeking behaviors which are made possible by wrong-headed government regulation. Wall Street and the banking industry are ripping the rest of us off. This accounts for a lot of inequality at the high end.


But what’s happening in the middle? Think about what it means to be middle-class, a category that in much literature represents the ideal of a good, gentle life, conducive to moderation, societal health, and the raising of good children.


In practice, to be middle class means you have a job that gives you little risk and pressure, while also paying you enough money to escape material need. Unlike a small businessman, you don’t ever have to worry if today is the day you lose your biggest customer. Unlike an unemployed unskilled laborer, you don’t have to worry where your next meal is coming from. At worst, you adjust to economic vicissitudes by modifying your consumption of small luxuries, like clothing from Neiman-Marcus or your annual vacation.


Being middle-class, as Roosevelt astutely realized, is all about SECURITY, which is the absence of risk.


I was led to this thought, as I mentioned, by noticing that in today’s uncertain environment, many people are adjusting by becoming contractors. They offer their services (from web-site design to domestic help to high-end legal work) on an ad-hoc basis, rather than as part of a permanent full-time job with benefits. A steadily increasing number of people get much of their income on Form 1099 rather than Form W-2.


Something similar happened during the Depression, but I saw it start to happen at mid-decade, even before the crisis hit. America has upwards of 20 million small businesses, and many of them are people who are simply marketing their skills as best they can, possibly employing a small number of assistants and tradespeople along the way.


Every entrepreneur understands the linkage between risk and reward, in an immediate and visceral way. There’s no safety net. Your success is determined by your hard work, intelligence, and no small amount of good luck. The reverse is true in equal measure. Plus, luck is out of your control, and it changes on a daily basis.


It makes a lot of sense that people who take a lot of risk should be rewarded for it. On the other hand, Paul Krugman, Robert Reich, and many others who see salvation in a rejuvenated labor movement, fantasize that we can somehow engineer a prosperous but genteel society in which nearly everyone can make a comfortable living without exposure to the gut-wrenching swings faced by entrepreneurs.


And can you blame them? This is a wonderful fantasy! How, indeed, can you focus on the most important task in your life, which is raising your children, if you’re constantly worrying about money? The natural human desire to avoid risk is indeed the source of most of the inherent instabilities in the financial system, and current reform efforts do less than nothing to change this.


(Have you ever seen a TV commercial while watching golf or the evening news, from some insurance company that promises you investments that gain value in good times, but provide good yields in weak times? If this notion attracts you, then you’re part of the problem.)


Market and finance people like me tend to believe that there is a fundamental linkage between risk and reward, cast in stone when the Hebrew God wrote the Ten Commandments. (“Thou shalt not leave thy gamma-exposure unhedged.”) Other people insist that the linkage is not fundamental. They say it’s not only possible, but actually a moral imperative to construct a society in which most people have a job that is both well-paying and secure, so they can rest easy at night.


Which of these views is true is a deep question that I can’t answer. But I will say that we achieved (or appear to have achieved) a near facsimile of the prosperous, stable promised land in the decades after World War II. These of course were the good old days of high labor-union participation.


But they were also days of extremely high rates of capital investment, and a generally closed economy with relatively little dependence on trade. They were the days when Detroit automakers could sign lavishly expensive labor contracts, incorrectly believing that they would never face real competition, and therefore needed no cost-structure flexibility.


We can’t go back to that world. But the fact that it existed suggests that we might be able to construct something like it.


Right now there is a notable lack of new ideas for macro policy that can foster a return to high real growth in the long term. This is what all the headscratching, chinpulling, and posturing from pundits, economists, and elected officials is all about. They got nuthin’.


But I think we can find our way back to the answer. As always, real answers and real change will come from people not heavily invested in the status quo. (Having a Nobel Prize in either economics or peace is a contrary indicator for new ideas and the ability to change.) In the absence of actual good answers, the intelligent policy is for government to step back and leave the private sector to either find the answers or not. This is the essence of the opportunity, and the challenge, facing the Republicans who will be returned to power this November.


The middle class is disappearing because the lack of long-term growth means that we don’t have enough prosperity to give most people a comfortable, risk-free life. This is a secular trend, having nothing to do with the recession that ended twelve months ago. We know that we can have a middle class because we did it once. But we also know that it was very much a historical anomaly.


There’s a right way to do this and a wrong way. Nostalgia for the Fifties is the wrong way. I don’t know what the right way is, but 20 million entrepreneurs will probably be able to find it.


As long as we stop taxing and regulating them to death.


Submitted by Gonzalo Lira

JPN ≠ US: Japan Is Not Us

Japan went through an equities and real estate boom during the 1980’s—a boom that was really a bubble. And like all bubbles, it eventually burst in 1990.
 
Since then, Japan has been lost. Equities have never again reached the heights of 1990, nor have real estate prices. The Japanese government has spent a fabulous amount of money for domestic stimulus, creating the most modern infrastructure on earth—yet it hasn’t helped at all. GDP has been anemic, as the population slowly begins to shrink. Japan is in full-on deflation—in every sense of the word.
 
Now that the United States has had its own real-estate bubble pricked, a lot of smart people have been selling the idea that the U.S. will experience what Japan has experienced: Persistently sluggish growth. Continued fiscal deficits, carried out by the Federal government in order to prop up aggregate demand by way of various stimulus programs. Slow and painful working out of the debt overhang. All of this happening within a deflationary environment, whereby the dollar—just like the yen in Japan—accrues value, as full-throttle deflation sets in.
 
In other words, this camp believes America is set to begin its own version of Japan’s Lost Decades.
 
This camp falls for what I call the “Japan Is Us” fallacy—and they are wrong.

Their rationale is simple—and superficially persuasive: Just like Japan in 1990, the United States went through a bubble in equities and real estate, which eventually popped in 2007–‘08. Since then—just like Japan—the U.S. has been experiencing deflation. Just like Japan, the U.S. now has zombie banks, the so-called “Too Big To Fail”. Just like the Japanese government, the U.S. government is spending-spending-spending, so as to prop up aggregate demand. The Federal Reserve—just like the Bank of Japan—is issuing enormous sums of money in order to prop up aggregate asset price levels—the Fed’s policies are so reminiscent of the BoJ’s money printing that Bernanke & Co. have borrowed the term outright: Quantitative easing.
 
Everything screams Just Like Japan—right? So according to the “Japan Is Us” camp, 2010 through at least 2015 will be just like Japan between 1990 and 2010: Sluggish growth, stagnation—and most important of all, deflation, deflation, deflation.
 
But there is one key difference that the Japan Is Us crowd conveniently ignore. They ignore it out of blindness, or incompetence, or—occasionally—out of malice. They ignore this key issue like the elephant in the room that’s gone and got drunk, and is now making a fool of himself: Balance of payments.

Balance of payments (BOP) is the measure of a country’s total exchange with the rest of the world. From the Federal Reserve’s “Fedpoints”:

  • The balance of payments is an accounting of a country's international transactions for a particular time period.
  • Any transaction that causes money to flow into a country is a credit to its BOP account, and any transaction that causes money to flow out is a debit.
  • The BOP includes the current account, which mainly measures the flows of goods and services; the capital account, which consists of capital transfers and the acquisition and disposal of non-produced, non-financial assets; and the financial account, which records investment flows.


(Emphasis added.)
 
The current account is the key metric: It’s the net balance between imports and exports. In other words, the trade surplus or deficit.
 
As everyone knows, the U.S. current account has been negative for a long, long time—in fact the last time the current account was in surplus was 1973. Since then, current account deficits have totaled about $7.5 trillion in nominal dollars. (Data is here.)
 
Japan, meanwhile, has had a current account surplus. I found a nifty chart that neatly summarizes the differences between the two countries:

Current account surplus/deficit per country as percent of world GDP. De Mello/Padoan.

(Original chart by Luis de Mello and Pier Carlo Padoan can be found here.)
 

To finance this massive current account deficit, the U.S. has sold assets to the rest of the world. The U.S. Federal government has gone into deficit spending on top of this current account deficit—it too has sold assets to cover the fiscal deficit.
 
So in a net sense, both the U.S. Federal government and the United States as a whole have “sold assets” to the rest of the world, in order to pay for their spending.
 
What “assets” have been sold to pay for all this spending? Basically, Treasury bonds. And as everyone knows, Treasuries might be called “assets” by the sophisticates, but they are really nothing more complicated than a loan.
 
In other words, Americans and their government have gone into massive debt with the rest of the world, in order to finance all this spending.
 
Japan, meanwhile, has been carrying a current account surplus. Therefore, the Japanese government has been borrowing money not from overseas, but from its own citizen’s savings. All of the Japanese government’s stimulus spending has been paid for by the Japanese people.
 
This is the main difference between the United States and Japan. It should be obvious—and ominous—what this difference means.
 
The U.S.—unlike Japan—cannot pay back its loans: Because the United States is broke. The Federal government is running deficits of around 10% of GDP. America as a whole has racked up $7.5 trillion in current account deficits over the last 25 years—over 50% of total GDP—with no end in sight.
 
So the United States—unlike Japan—has been spending what it does not have. The U.S.—unlike Japan—depends on the rest of the world to lend it money to continue on this spending spree. Americans—unlike Japan—do not produce enough to self-finance its government’s stimulus programs.
 
Therefore—unlike Japan—the United States will eventually be unable to pay the Treasury bonds it has issued. Therefore, as I wrote in A Termite-Riddled House, there will be a collapse in the Treasury bond market. Therefore, as I wrote in How Hyperinflation Will Happen, a panic in Treasuries will mean a run up of commodities—which will bring about the death of the dollar, and hyperinflation in America.
 
This is why Japan Is NOT Us.
 
But even if you don’t subscribe to my hyperinflationary scenario—even if you think I’m full of shit on this issue (and plenty of sensible people think I’m full of it to the brim)—it’s obvious that Japan is not like the United States—it’s obvious to anyone who looks at the situation evenhandedly: The contrast in the two countries’ balance of payments is enough to show definitively and unequivocally that they are not the same.
 
The source of the two countries’ funding is key: One produces its own stimulus from its current account surplus, while the other borrows it from abroad, adding more debt on top of its already existing debt. Therefore, one country’s spending and stimulus programs—Japan’s—are sustainable, while the other’s—America’s—is not. Which means that the mechanisms for this fiscal debt—sovereign bonds—are rock solid in Japan, but lethal in America.
 
So if it’s so obvious that the two countries’ situations are so different, then who is selling this clearly false notion that Japan Is Us?
 
Why, people who have a vested interest in this point of view. People who are selling things. Or people who are trying to explain away why they have lost so much money by making the wrong bets.
 
For instance, money managers. A lot of pseudo-Austrian money managers in particular have been doing the hard sell to their clients, insisting and insisting that the U.S. is experiencing Japan-redux. They have been steering their clients’ money to Treasury bonds—because if you were in Japan in 1990, their sovereign bonds turned out to be the smartest investments in the long run.
 
But as we have seen, the U.S. is not Japan.
 
So these money managers who are playing the Japan Is Us trade have either lost their shirt, or are terrified that they are about to. Because everyone knows that U.S. Treasury bonds are overpriced, and that it’s only a matter of time before this Treasury bubble pops.
 
And when it pops, it will be bad—a lot of people counting on the United States following in the footsteps of Japan won’t just lose a bit: They’ll lose huge. They’ll be wiped out—or maybe they won’t be wiped out, but their clients sure will be.
 
That’s why so many people keep insisting that Japan Is Us!-Japan Is Us!-Japan Is Us! They are selling their clients on something, or else trying to explain away their underperformance, by sheer force of personality—while ignoring the blindingly obvious fact that the U.S. is not Japan.
 
One prominent blogger in particular has been going insane, insisting day after day that Japan Is Us, to the point of psychosis—evidence to the contrary be damned. Every day, this blogger—Michael “Mish” Shedlock—bangs on the same old tired drum. Mr. Shedlock is affiliated with Sitka Pacific, whose performance leaves something to be desired. There are, apparently, a number of Sitka Pacific clients quite nervous about the direction of their investments. So it is reasonable to question whether Mr. Shedlock is ranting and raving how the U.S. is following the deflationary spiral that Japan did because he genuinely believes what he is saying, or because he is trying to convince someone—maybe his clients, maybe himself—of something that he knows in his bones might not be true.
 
What is true is that anyone who has made bets that Japan Is Us will soon find out if they were wise bets, or foolish ones. The Treasury bubble is soon to burst—so we’ll know the fate of the American economy soon enough.
 
If those bets turn out to be foolish—if it turns out that, indeed, Japan Is Not Us—just keep in mind one final fact: An average person can survive a leap from a third floor window, even a fourth floor window.
 
But a leap from a fifth floor window or higher? That’s how you get the job done right. You jump from a fifth floor window, and you’ll go splat!—guaranteed.
 
Full disclosure: I do not manage any money except for my personal stake and my family’s private interests. I do not provide professional investment advice to anyone. I am not affiliated to, nor am a spokesman for any third party investment or financial company. I do not endorse any product, save Head squash raquets, Slazenger squash balls, Montecristo (Cuba) cigars, Cálem vintage port wines, and Durex X-Treme X-Long X-Large X-Tra Comfort condoms.




Kinect will talk to MSN Messenger Xbox 360 <b>News</b> - Page 1 <b>...</b>

Read our Xbox 360 news of Kinect will talk to MSN Messenger.

Nintendo: 4m 3DS sales in first month 3DS <b>News</b> - Page 1 <b>...</b>

Read our 3DS news of Nintendo: 4m 3DS sales in first month.

<b>News</b> Roundup: Gordon Ramsay Responds to Chef&#39;s Suicide, Brad <b>...</b>

Gordon Ramsay has opened up about the death of 'Kitchen Nightmares' contestant Joseph Cerniglia. According to Entertainment Weekly, Ramsay expressed.


bench craft company rip off
bench craft company rip off

Vietnamise Boat Girl by TaylorMiles


Kinect will talk to MSN Messenger Xbox 360 <b>News</b> - Page 1 <b>...</b>

Read our Xbox 360 news of Kinect will talk to MSN Messenger.

Nintendo: 4m 3DS sales in first month 3DS <b>News</b> - Page 1 <b>...</b>

Read our 3DS news of Nintendo: 4m 3DS sales in first month.

<b>News</b> Roundup: Gordon Ramsay Responds to Chef&#39;s Suicide, Brad <b>...</b>

Gordon Ramsay has opened up about the death of 'Kitchen Nightmares' contestant Joseph Cerniglia. According to Entertainment Weekly, Ramsay expressed.


bench craft company rip off benchcraft company scam

Paul Krugman is on again today about the disappearing middle class, and how the Bush tax cuts are and always have been a huge, unfair giveaway to “the rich,” whoever they are. Because I happen to remember that the Bush tax cuts actually were an across-the-board cut in marginal rates, together with strong reductions in taxes on capital, I wondered how Krugman gets from there to considering them unfair.


Well, of course it’s because high-income people pay more taxes than lower-income people. A LOT more taxes. So any change in marginal rates necessarily affects them more, whether you raise rates or cut them. Clearly enough, Krugman doesn’t have a problem with low tax rates. He has a problem with the fact that some people earn a lot of money.


That got me wondering why we have so much income inequality in the first place. I don’t think there’s one simple answer to that question, but a lot of it comes down to the amount of risk you take.



First, let’s quickly acknowledge a few important things. It’s true that a lack of good education means that millions of unfortunate people have little of worth to trade in return for a good living. That accounts for a lot of inequality at the low end of the scale.


It’s also true that much if not most of the financial industry has shifted from making capital available for investment, to a range of rent-seeking behaviors which are made possible by wrong-headed government regulation. Wall Street and the banking industry are ripping the rest of us off. This accounts for a lot of inequality at the high end.


But what’s happening in the middle? Think about what it means to be middle-class, a category that in much literature represents the ideal of a good, gentle life, conducive to moderation, societal health, and the raising of good children.


In practice, to be middle class means you have a job that gives you little risk and pressure, while also paying you enough money to escape material need. Unlike a small businessman, you don’t ever have to worry if today is the day you lose your biggest customer. Unlike an unemployed unskilled laborer, you don’t have to worry where your next meal is coming from. At worst, you adjust to economic vicissitudes by modifying your consumption of small luxuries, like clothing from Neiman-Marcus or your annual vacation.


Being middle-class, as Roosevelt astutely realized, is all about SECURITY, which is the absence of risk.


I was led to this thought, as I mentioned, by noticing that in today’s uncertain environment, many people are adjusting by becoming contractors. They offer their services (from web-site design to domestic help to high-end legal work) on an ad-hoc basis, rather than as part of a permanent full-time job with benefits. A steadily increasing number of people get much of their income on Form 1099 rather than Form W-2.


Something similar happened during the Depression, but I saw it start to happen at mid-decade, even before the crisis hit. America has upwards of 20 million small businesses, and many of them are people who are simply marketing their skills as best they can, possibly employing a small number of assistants and tradespeople along the way.


Every entrepreneur understands the linkage between risk and reward, in an immediate and visceral way. There’s no safety net. Your success is determined by your hard work, intelligence, and no small amount of good luck. The reverse is true in equal measure. Plus, luck is out of your control, and it changes on a daily basis.


It makes a lot of sense that people who take a lot of risk should be rewarded for it. On the other hand, Paul Krugman, Robert Reich, and many others who see salvation in a rejuvenated labor movement, fantasize that we can somehow engineer a prosperous but genteel society in which nearly everyone can make a comfortable living without exposure to the gut-wrenching swings faced by entrepreneurs.


And can you blame them? This is a wonderful fantasy! How, indeed, can you focus on the most important task in your life, which is raising your children, if you’re constantly worrying about money? The natural human desire to avoid risk is indeed the source of most of the inherent instabilities in the financial system, and current reform efforts do less than nothing to change this.


(Have you ever seen a TV commercial while watching golf or the evening news, from some insurance company that promises you investments that gain value in good times, but provide good yields in weak times? If this notion attracts you, then you’re part of the problem.)


Market and finance people like me tend to believe that there is a fundamental linkage between risk and reward, cast in stone when the Hebrew God wrote the Ten Commandments. (“Thou shalt not leave thy gamma-exposure unhedged.”) Other people insist that the linkage is not fundamental. They say it’s not only possible, but actually a moral imperative to construct a society in which most people have a job that is both well-paying and secure, so they can rest easy at night.


Which of these views is true is a deep question that I can’t answer. But I will say that we achieved (or appear to have achieved) a near facsimile of the prosperous, stable promised land in the decades after World War II. These of course were the good old days of high labor-union participation.


But they were also days of extremely high rates of capital investment, and a generally closed economy with relatively little dependence on trade. They were the days when Detroit automakers could sign lavishly expensive labor contracts, incorrectly believing that they would never face real competition, and therefore needed no cost-structure flexibility.


We can’t go back to that world. But the fact that it existed suggests that we might be able to construct something like it.


Right now there is a notable lack of new ideas for macro policy that can foster a return to high real growth in the long term. This is what all the headscratching, chinpulling, and posturing from pundits, economists, and elected officials is all about. They got nuthin’.


But I think we can find our way back to the answer. As always, real answers and real change will come from people not heavily invested in the status quo. (Having a Nobel Prize in either economics or peace is a contrary indicator for new ideas and the ability to change.) In the absence of actual good answers, the intelligent policy is for government to step back and leave the private sector to either find the answers or not. This is the essence of the opportunity, and the challenge, facing the Republicans who will be returned to power this November.


The middle class is disappearing because the lack of long-term growth means that we don’t have enough prosperity to give most people a comfortable, risk-free life. This is a secular trend, having nothing to do with the recession that ended twelve months ago. We know that we can have a middle class because we did it once. But we also know that it was very much a historical anomaly.


There’s a right way to do this and a wrong way. Nostalgia for the Fifties is the wrong way. I don’t know what the right way is, but 20 million entrepreneurs will probably be able to find it.


As long as we stop taxing and regulating them to death.


Submitted by Gonzalo Lira

JPN ≠ US: Japan Is Not Us

Japan went through an equities and real estate boom during the 1980’s—a boom that was really a bubble. And like all bubbles, it eventually burst in 1990.
 
Since then, Japan has been lost. Equities have never again reached the heights of 1990, nor have real estate prices. The Japanese government has spent a fabulous amount of money for domestic stimulus, creating the most modern infrastructure on earth—yet it hasn’t helped at all. GDP has been anemic, as the population slowly begins to shrink. Japan is in full-on deflation—in every sense of the word.
 
Now that the United States has had its own real-estate bubble pricked, a lot of smart people have been selling the idea that the U.S. will experience what Japan has experienced: Persistently sluggish growth. Continued fiscal deficits, carried out by the Federal government in order to prop up aggregate demand by way of various stimulus programs. Slow and painful working out of the debt overhang. All of this happening within a deflationary environment, whereby the dollar—just like the yen in Japan—accrues value, as full-throttle deflation sets in.
 
In other words, this camp believes America is set to begin its own version of Japan’s Lost Decades.
 
This camp falls for what I call the “Japan Is Us” fallacy—and they are wrong.

Their rationale is simple—and superficially persuasive: Just like Japan in 1990, the United States went through a bubble in equities and real estate, which eventually popped in 2007–‘08. Since then—just like Japan—the U.S. has been experiencing deflation. Just like Japan, the U.S. now has zombie banks, the so-called “Too Big To Fail”. Just like the Japanese government, the U.S. government is spending-spending-spending, so as to prop up aggregate demand. The Federal Reserve—just like the Bank of Japan—is issuing enormous sums of money in order to prop up aggregate asset price levels—the Fed’s policies are so reminiscent of the BoJ’s money printing that Bernanke & Co. have borrowed the term outright: Quantitative easing.
 
Everything screams Just Like Japan—right? So according to the “Japan Is Us” camp, 2010 through at least 2015 will be just like Japan between 1990 and 2010: Sluggish growth, stagnation—and most important of all, deflation, deflation, deflation.
 
But there is one key difference that the Japan Is Us crowd conveniently ignore. They ignore it out of blindness, or incompetence, or—occasionally—out of malice. They ignore this key issue like the elephant in the room that’s gone and got drunk, and is now making a fool of himself: Balance of payments.

Balance of payments (BOP) is the measure of a country’s total exchange with the rest of the world. From the Federal Reserve’s “Fedpoints”:

  • The balance of payments is an accounting of a country's international transactions for a particular time period.
  • Any transaction that causes money to flow into a country is a credit to its BOP account, and any transaction that causes money to flow out is a debit.
  • The BOP includes the current account, which mainly measures the flows of goods and services; the capital account, which consists of capital transfers and the acquisition and disposal of non-produced, non-financial assets; and the financial account, which records investment flows.


(Emphasis added.)
 
The current account is the key metric: It’s the net balance between imports and exports. In other words, the trade surplus or deficit.
 
As everyone knows, the U.S. current account has been negative for a long, long time—in fact the last time the current account was in surplus was 1973. Since then, current account deficits have totaled about $7.5 trillion in nominal dollars. (Data is here.)
 
Japan, meanwhile, has had a current account surplus. I found a nifty chart that neatly summarizes the differences between the two countries:

Current account surplus/deficit per country as percent of world GDP. De Mello/Padoan.

(Original chart by Luis de Mello and Pier Carlo Padoan can be found here.)
 

To finance this massive current account deficit, the U.S. has sold assets to the rest of the world. The U.S. Federal government has gone into deficit spending on top of this current account deficit—it too has sold assets to cover the fiscal deficit.
 
So in a net sense, both the U.S. Federal government and the United States as a whole have “sold assets” to the rest of the world, in order to pay for their spending.
 
What “assets” have been sold to pay for all this spending? Basically, Treasury bonds. And as everyone knows, Treasuries might be called “assets” by the sophisticates, but they are really nothing more complicated than a loan.
 
In other words, Americans and their government have gone into massive debt with the rest of the world, in order to finance all this spending.
 
Japan, meanwhile, has been carrying a current account surplus. Therefore, the Japanese government has been borrowing money not from overseas, but from its own citizen’s savings. All of the Japanese government’s stimulus spending has been paid for by the Japanese people.
 
This is the main difference between the United States and Japan. It should be obvious—and ominous—what this difference means.
 
The U.S.—unlike Japan—cannot pay back its loans: Because the United States is broke. The Federal government is running deficits of around 10% of GDP. America as a whole has racked up $7.5 trillion in current account deficits over the last 25 years—over 50% of total GDP—with no end in sight.
 
So the United States—unlike Japan—has been spending what it does not have. The U.S.—unlike Japan—depends on the rest of the world to lend it money to continue on this spending spree. Americans—unlike Japan—do not produce enough to self-finance its government’s stimulus programs.
 
Therefore—unlike Japan—the United States will eventually be unable to pay the Treasury bonds it has issued. Therefore, as I wrote in A Termite-Riddled House, there will be a collapse in the Treasury bond market. Therefore, as I wrote in How Hyperinflation Will Happen, a panic in Treasuries will mean a run up of commodities—which will bring about the death of the dollar, and hyperinflation in America.
 
This is why Japan Is NOT Us.
 
But even if you don’t subscribe to my hyperinflationary scenario—even if you think I’m full of shit on this issue (and plenty of sensible people think I’m full of it to the brim)—it’s obvious that Japan is not like the United States—it’s obvious to anyone who looks at the situation evenhandedly: The contrast in the two countries’ balance of payments is enough to show definitively and unequivocally that they are not the same.
 
The source of the two countries’ funding is key: One produces its own stimulus from its current account surplus, while the other borrows it from abroad, adding more debt on top of its already existing debt. Therefore, one country’s spending and stimulus programs—Japan’s—are sustainable, while the other’s—America’s—is not. Which means that the mechanisms for this fiscal debt—sovereign bonds—are rock solid in Japan, but lethal in America.
 
So if it’s so obvious that the two countries’ situations are so different, then who is selling this clearly false notion that Japan Is Us?
 
Why, people who have a vested interest in this point of view. People who are selling things. Or people who are trying to explain away why they have lost so much money by making the wrong bets.
 
For instance, money managers. A lot of pseudo-Austrian money managers in particular have been doing the hard sell to their clients, insisting and insisting that the U.S. is experiencing Japan-redux. They have been steering their clients’ money to Treasury bonds—because if you were in Japan in 1990, their sovereign bonds turned out to be the smartest investments in the long run.
 
But as we have seen, the U.S. is not Japan.
 
So these money managers who are playing the Japan Is Us trade have either lost their shirt, or are terrified that they are about to. Because everyone knows that U.S. Treasury bonds are overpriced, and that it’s only a matter of time before this Treasury bubble pops.
 
And when it pops, it will be bad—a lot of people counting on the United States following in the footsteps of Japan won’t just lose a bit: They’ll lose huge. They’ll be wiped out—or maybe they won’t be wiped out, but their clients sure will be.
 
That’s why so many people keep insisting that Japan Is Us!-Japan Is Us!-Japan Is Us! They are selling their clients on something, or else trying to explain away their underperformance, by sheer force of personality—while ignoring the blindingly obvious fact that the U.S. is not Japan.
 
One prominent blogger in particular has been going insane, insisting day after day that Japan Is Us, to the point of psychosis—evidence to the contrary be damned. Every day, this blogger—Michael “Mish” Shedlock—bangs on the same old tired drum. Mr. Shedlock is affiliated with Sitka Pacific, whose performance leaves something to be desired. There are, apparently, a number of Sitka Pacific clients quite nervous about the direction of their investments. So it is reasonable to question whether Mr. Shedlock is ranting and raving how the U.S. is following the deflationary spiral that Japan did because he genuinely believes what he is saying, or because he is trying to convince someone—maybe his clients, maybe himself—of something that he knows in his bones might not be true.
 
What is true is that anyone who has made bets that Japan Is Us will soon find out if they were wise bets, or foolish ones. The Treasury bubble is soon to burst—so we’ll know the fate of the American economy soon enough.
 
If those bets turn out to be foolish—if it turns out that, indeed, Japan Is Not Us—just keep in mind one final fact: An average person can survive a leap from a third floor window, even a fourth floor window.
 
But a leap from a fifth floor window or higher? That’s how you get the job done right. You jump from a fifth floor window, and you’ll go splat!—guaranteed.
 
Full disclosure: I do not manage any money except for my personal stake and my family’s private interests. I do not provide professional investment advice to anyone. I am not affiliated to, nor am a spokesman for any third party investment or financial company. I do not endorse any product, save Head squash raquets, Slazenger squash balls, Montecristo (Cuba) cigars, Cálem vintage port wines, and Durex X-Treme X-Long X-Large X-Tra Comfort condoms.




benchcraft company scam

Kinect will talk to MSN Messenger Xbox 360 <b>News</b> - Page 1 <b>...</b>

Read our Xbox 360 news of Kinect will talk to MSN Messenger.

Nintendo: 4m 3DS sales in first month 3DS <b>News</b> - Page 1 <b>...</b>

Read our 3DS news of Nintendo: 4m 3DS sales in first month.

<b>News</b> Roundup: Gordon Ramsay Responds to Chef&#39;s Suicide, Brad <b>...</b>

Gordon Ramsay has opened up about the death of 'Kitchen Nightmares' contestant Joseph Cerniglia. According to Entertainment Weekly, Ramsay expressed.


benchcraft company scam bench craft company rip off

Kinect will talk to MSN Messenger Xbox 360 <b>News</b> - Page 1 <b>...</b>

Read our Xbox 360 news of Kinect will talk to MSN Messenger.

Nintendo: 4m 3DS sales in first month 3DS <b>News</b> - Page 1 <b>...</b>

Read our 3DS news of Nintendo: 4m 3DS sales in first month.

<b>News</b> Roundup: Gordon Ramsay Responds to Chef&#39;s Suicide, Brad <b>...</b>

Gordon Ramsay has opened up about the death of 'Kitchen Nightmares' contestant Joseph Cerniglia. According to Entertainment Weekly, Ramsay expressed.


benchcraft company scam benchcraft company scam

Kinect will talk to MSN Messenger Xbox 360 <b>News</b> - Page 1 <b>...</b>

Read our Xbox 360 news of Kinect will talk to MSN Messenger.

Nintendo: 4m 3DS sales in first month 3DS <b>News</b> - Page 1 <b>...</b>

Read our 3DS news of Nintendo: 4m 3DS sales in first month.

<b>News</b> Roundup: Gordon Ramsay Responds to Chef&#39;s Suicide, Brad <b>...</b>

Gordon Ramsay has opened up about the death of 'Kitchen Nightmares' contestant Joseph Cerniglia. According to Entertainment Weekly, Ramsay expressed.


benchcraft company scam












































Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Making Money Ebay

Recently I went to visit an acquaintance who was trashing out his own condo. There were hinges to be pried out of doorways and appliances to take for eBay. The house had become inert, a non-house: trapped somewhere between the building's association who wanted the fees owed to pay for the building's roof and walls and the like, the people who wanted the property taxes to pay for things like schools and street lights and roads and the people who were in charge of collecting (or more likely not collecting) the mortgage for whomever actually owned the mortgage debt (at the end of that chain, quite possibly you and me). These various claimants made the house largely worthless—more worthless than the latest assessment, which was… well, a comparable apartment nearby had recently sold for $120,000. It had been listed at $325,000 in May, 2009. That $120,000 sale price was not much higher than that apartment's last sale—twenty years ago.


Anyway, it was somewhat likely that, after the investment of some work on this apartment that was being trashed out, such as providing it with new door hinges and appliances, the association would find a renter unafraid of a possibly surprising ending to his rental agreement term in exchange for a below-market rent. That would be a best outcome.


The others would most likely find no purchase for their attempts to collect (the owner was protected by bankruptcy), and certainly the bank had little incentive to collect the mortgage, although their claims on the title would likely make finding a purchaser difficult.


One of the few chairs remaining in the near-vacant condo was occupied by someone on the other side, as it were. Someone not in bankruptcy, for one thing. This person had recently made a $200,000 offer on two-bedroom apartment in a nice part of town. (Needless to say, this town was not New York City.)


But when he had gone to get a mortgage, the bank had balked, because that apartment now assessed at half that value, and so now his current offer for the two-bedroom was at something like $78,000, having come up from something like $65,000 or $72,000. That offer number was jiggling and that title too was somewhat not entirely not cloudy, because that condo association was trying to get a bit of the sale money for past unpaid maintenance under the old owner, which seems, if logical, a bit short-sighted of the association's best interests. They ran the risk of receiving zero dollars instead of some dollars, by dragging the potential new owner into someone else's debt.


But then, we're pretty much all subject to someone else's debt these days, even those of us who rent. Renters are shielded from what is happening with a property, except when they receive a stray envelope addressed to their landlords, or the records pop up online—and the record-keeping systems, when I look up mortgages and sales online, seem to me to be bogged down and very tardy. I imagine the one or two municipal employees in each town in America with the responsibility of making these things public crouched in some little cave, with a stack of depressing white and red and yellow paper towering over their little desks. (Really, it's probably all done by computers. With near- or off-shored labor—somewhere in Utah or Israel.)


In any event, there it was: the magical $78,000 two-bedroom apartment. The steal of a lifetime. The great American get-ahead.


I bring this up in part because this Sunday, at the Brooklyn Book Festival, there is a panel at noon which includes Naomi Klein and Kurt Andersen and Jordan Flaherty and also Paul Reyes. His new book, Exiles in Eden—some of which is in the August issue of Harper's—is an account of going to work for his father, who has for some time now been a trasher-outer of abandoned and foreclosed homes. In the book, Reyes follows the trail of breadcrumbs of the people who've abandoned or been evicted from their houses to the foreclosure auctions, and along the way meets people like the housing advocates who've installed squatters in vacant properties.


(The panel is slotted against "Me… In The World," which stars Sam Lipsyte, and a panel called "Pop Life: Music, Memory, and America’s Coming of Age," with Ta-Nehisi Coates, which may be more appealing and relaxing and better-attended, but then we all have to make difficult choices in these times.)


Reyes did the first reading from his book the other week and something odd happened. He did not get author-friendly questions about the precious process of writing his book. Instead, a long discussion ensued among the audience members about the financial system and the housing market. In the audience were brokers and bankers and homeowners and renters. A mass of anecdotage and experience and theory was shared. It was something like an impromptu consciousness-raising session, very thorough, and when the audience left, everyone had had time to sift through his and her experiences with the state of our financial system and to incorporate some fresh input.


"The audience reaction was exactly what I'd hoped for," Reyes wrote to me the other day. "I'm certainly happy to stand up there and blather for twenty minutes, but I'd much rather have an intense discussion about this issue and hear what people have been through and what their ideas are."


Although he'll be taking this conversation to the Times' Opinionator blog's Living Rooms section soon, he does not have at this time many in-person readings scheduled; author reading tours are not booked by publishers much these days.


"I'm trying to work the promotion of the book into a split personality tour of sorts–between the narrative journalist and housing wonk," Reyes wrote. "If all goes well, I'll drop in on university classes in the daytime, then hit the bookstores at night. I'll wear a different pair of glasses for each role, of course."


Next week, on the 14th, Reyes will be reading as well at the Enoch Pratt Library in Baltimore. Perhaps you'd like him to visit your fine local bookstore, classroom or community center. His email address is on his website.








This video can be downloaded from here;
http://www.mediafire.com/?fvv4bf2ssvk...
Please feel free to mirror it, but if you do please also included the links contained in this description.


The Show:
The show will start at 4pm (BST) on Saturday 18 September.
It will be shown here;
http://www.blogtv.com/People/dprjones
To see what time that is where you are go to;
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock...


The Charity:
If you want any information about the charity please contact me or watch my previous videos or go to one of the websites, some are which are;
MSF(UK)
http://www.msf.org.uk/
MSF(US) (Doctors without Borders)
http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/
MSF(Australia)
http://www.msf.org.au/
MSF(Canada)
http://www.msf.ca/

The MSF(UK) youtube channel is here;
http://www.youtube.com/user/msfuk


How to donate:
On MSF's recommendation I have set up donation pages at the following sites;
Justgiving;
http://www.justgiving.com/dprjones24h...
THIS SITE ACCEPTS DONATIONS THROUGH PAYPAL
Firstgiving;
http://www.firstgiving.com/dprjones

Both these sites provide an effective, safe and secure method of making donations. You will not get junk e-mails not will your details be distributed.
The pages are open now if you want to donate. They will also remain open for a further 2 months after the show.


The schedule of the hosts and co-hosts:
This video contains the best information that I can give at the moment. There are likely to be some minor changes before the event. I'll be posting an update video nearer the time with a full schedule.
For the avoidance of doubt, Michael Shermer will not be on the show, but was kind enough to provide the clip used at the beginning of this video.

The e-bay auction:
If you have any items that you wish to donate then please contact;
http://www.youtube.com/user/Proportio...

The MSF's got Talent competition is open until 12th September. Please watch the video below for details on how to enter. NOTE, mirroring of the video is no longer a necessary requirement.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6PKQz...







Obama: Fox <b>News</b> Has A Point Of View That Is &#39;Ultimately <b>...</b>

President Obama has given a lengthy interview to Rolling Stone publisher Jann Wenner for the upcoming issue of the magazine. The cover story is titled Obama Fights Back and boy does he ever. At least where Fox News is concerned.

Obama Says Fox <b>News</b> Is Hurting The Growth Of The United States

President targets Murdoch, hedge fund executives, and whiny Democrats in Rolling Stone interview.

COD: Black Ops zombies spotted again <b>News</b> - Page 1 | Eurogamer.net

Read our news of COD: Black Ops zombies spotted again.

halloween costumes

Obama: Fox <b>News</b> Has A Point Of View That Is &#39;Ultimately <b>...</b>

President Obama has given a lengthy interview to Rolling Stone publisher Jann Wenner for the upcoming issue of the magazine. The cover story is titled Obama Fights Back and boy does he ever. At least where Fox News is concerned.

Obama Says Fox <b>News</b> Is Hurting The Growth Of The United States

President targets Murdoch, hedge fund executives, and whiny Democrats in Rolling Stone interview.

COD: Black Ops zombies spotted again <b>News</b> - Page 1 | Eurogamer.net

Read our news of COD: Black Ops zombies spotted again.

Recently I went to visit an acquaintance who was trashing out his own condo. There were hinges to be pried out of doorways and appliances to take for eBay. The house had become inert, a non-house: trapped somewhere between the building's association who wanted the fees owed to pay for the building's roof and walls and the like, the people who wanted the property taxes to pay for things like schools and street lights and roads and the people who were in charge of collecting (or more likely not collecting) the mortgage for whomever actually owned the mortgage debt (at the end of that chain, quite possibly you and me). These various claimants made the house largely worthless—more worthless than the latest assessment, which was… well, a comparable apartment nearby had recently sold for $120,000. It had been listed at $325,000 in May, 2009. That $120,000 sale price was not much higher than that apartment's last sale—twenty years ago.


Anyway, it was somewhat likely that, after the investment of some work on this apartment that was being trashed out, such as providing it with new door hinges and appliances, the association would find a renter unafraid of a possibly surprising ending to his rental agreement term in exchange for a below-market rent. That would be a best outcome.


The others would most likely find no purchase for their attempts to collect (the owner was protected by bankruptcy), and certainly the bank had little incentive to collect the mortgage, although their claims on the title would likely make finding a purchaser difficult.


One of the few chairs remaining in the near-vacant condo was occupied by someone on the other side, as it were. Someone not in bankruptcy, for one thing. This person had recently made a $200,000 offer on two-bedroom apartment in a nice part of town. (Needless to say, this town was not New York City.)


But when he had gone to get a mortgage, the bank had balked, because that apartment now assessed at half that value, and so now his current offer for the two-bedroom was at something like $78,000, having come up from something like $65,000 or $72,000. That offer number was jiggling and that title too was somewhat not entirely not cloudy, because that condo association was trying to get a bit of the sale money for past unpaid maintenance under the old owner, which seems, if logical, a bit short-sighted of the association's best interests. They ran the risk of receiving zero dollars instead of some dollars, by dragging the potential new owner into someone else's debt.


But then, we're pretty much all subject to someone else's debt these days, even those of us who rent. Renters are shielded from what is happening with a property, except when they receive a stray envelope addressed to their landlords, or the records pop up online—and the record-keeping systems, when I look up mortgages and sales online, seem to me to be bogged down and very tardy. I imagine the one or two municipal employees in each town in America with the responsibility of making these things public crouched in some little cave, with a stack of depressing white and red and yellow paper towering over their little desks. (Really, it's probably all done by computers. With near- or off-shored labor—somewhere in Utah or Israel.)


In any event, there it was: the magical $78,000 two-bedroom apartment. The steal of a lifetime. The great American get-ahead.


I bring this up in part because this Sunday, at the Brooklyn Book Festival, there is a panel at noon which includes Naomi Klein and Kurt Andersen and Jordan Flaherty and also Paul Reyes. His new book, Exiles in Eden—some of which is in the August issue of Harper's—is an account of going to work for his father, who has for some time now been a trasher-outer of abandoned and foreclosed homes. In the book, Reyes follows the trail of breadcrumbs of the people who've abandoned or been evicted from their houses to the foreclosure auctions, and along the way meets people like the housing advocates who've installed squatters in vacant properties.


(The panel is slotted against "Me… In The World," which stars Sam Lipsyte, and a panel called "Pop Life: Music, Memory, and America’s Coming of Age," with Ta-Nehisi Coates, which may be more appealing and relaxing and better-attended, but then we all have to make difficult choices in these times.)


Reyes did the first reading from his book the other week and something odd happened. He did not get author-friendly questions about the precious process of writing his book. Instead, a long discussion ensued among the audience members about the financial system and the housing market. In the audience were brokers and bankers and homeowners and renters. A mass of anecdotage and experience and theory was shared. It was something like an impromptu consciousness-raising session, very thorough, and when the audience left, everyone had had time to sift through his and her experiences with the state of our financial system and to incorporate some fresh input.


"The audience reaction was exactly what I'd hoped for," Reyes wrote to me the other day. "I'm certainly happy to stand up there and blather for twenty minutes, but I'd much rather have an intense discussion about this issue and hear what people have been through and what their ideas are."


Although he'll be taking this conversation to the Times' Opinionator blog's Living Rooms section soon, he does not have at this time many in-person readings scheduled; author reading tours are not booked by publishers much these days.


"I'm trying to work the promotion of the book into a split personality tour of sorts–between the narrative journalist and housing wonk," Reyes wrote. "If all goes well, I'll drop in on university classes in the daytime, then hit the bookstores at night. I'll wear a different pair of glasses for each role, of course."


Next week, on the 14th, Reyes will be reading as well at the Enoch Pratt Library in Baltimore. Perhaps you'd like him to visit your fine local bookstore, classroom or community center. His email address is on his website.








This video can be downloaded from here;
http://www.mediafire.com/?fvv4bf2ssvk...
Please feel free to mirror it, but if you do please also included the links contained in this description.


The Show:
The show will start at 4pm (BST) on Saturday 18 September.
It will be shown here;
http://www.blogtv.com/People/dprjones
To see what time that is where you are go to;
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock...


The Charity:
If you want any information about the charity please contact me or watch my previous videos or go to one of the websites, some are which are;
MSF(UK)
http://www.msf.org.uk/
MSF(US) (Doctors without Borders)
http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/
MSF(Australia)
http://www.msf.org.au/
MSF(Canada)
http://www.msf.ca/

The MSF(UK) youtube channel is here;
http://www.youtube.com/user/msfuk


How to donate:
On MSF's recommendation I have set up donation pages at the following sites;
Justgiving;
http://www.justgiving.com/dprjones24h...
THIS SITE ACCEPTS DONATIONS THROUGH PAYPAL
Firstgiving;
http://www.firstgiving.com/dprjones

Both these sites provide an effective, safe and secure method of making donations. You will not get junk e-mails not will your details be distributed.
The pages are open now if you want to donate. They will also remain open for a further 2 months after the show.


The schedule of the hosts and co-hosts:
This video contains the best information that I can give at the moment. There are likely to be some minor changes before the event. I'll be posting an update video nearer the time with a full schedule.
For the avoidance of doubt, Michael Shermer will not be on the show, but was kind enough to provide the clip used at the beginning of this video.

The e-bay auction:
If you have any items that you wish to donate then please contact;
http://www.youtube.com/user/Proportio...

The MSF's got Talent competition is open until 12th September. Please watch the video below for details on how to enter. NOTE, mirroring of the video is no longer a necessary requirement.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6PKQz...








Chinese Hawthorne Pattern Baluster Garniture Vase yqz Sold on eBay by Million Dollar Power Seller Norb Novocin on estateauctionsinc id by gettingsoldonebay

corporate reputation management

Obama: Fox <b>News</b> Has A Point Of View That Is &#39;Ultimately <b>...</b>

President Obama has given a lengthy interview to Rolling Stone publisher Jann Wenner for the upcoming issue of the magazine. The cover story is titled Obama Fights Back and boy does he ever. At least where Fox News is concerned.

Obama Says Fox <b>News</b> Is Hurting The Growth Of The United States

President targets Murdoch, hedge fund executives, and whiny Democrats in Rolling Stone interview.

COD: Black Ops zombies spotted again <b>News</b> - Page 1 | Eurogamer.net

Read our news of COD: Black Ops zombies spotted again.

Dr. eric seiger

Obama: Fox <b>News</b> Has A Point Of View That Is &#39;Ultimately <b>...</b>

President Obama has given a lengthy interview to Rolling Stone publisher Jann Wenner for the upcoming issue of the magazine. The cover story is titled Obama Fights Back and boy does he ever. At least where Fox News is concerned.

Obama Says Fox <b>News</b> Is Hurting The Growth Of The United States

President targets Murdoch, hedge fund executives, and whiny Democrats in Rolling Stone interview.

COD: Black Ops zombies spotted again <b>News</b> - Page 1 | Eurogamer.net

Read our news of COD: Black Ops zombies spotted again.


Chinese Hawthorne Pattern Baluster Garniture Vase yqz Sold on eBay by Million Dollar Power Seller Norb Novocin on estateauctionsinc id by gettingsoldonebay

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_18/b4032066.htm

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_18/b4032066.htm

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_18/b4032066.htm

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1999/10/25/267811/index.htm

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1999/10/25/267811/index.htm

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1999/10/25/267811/index.htm

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_18/b4032066.htm

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Making Money Quickly









Rock Out with Your Blocks Out



The Stretch Your Mind track was aptly named. Sessions ranged from panels on netbook consumer behavior to security to in depth development platform reviews for Adobe AIR and MeeGo SDK. The power behind all of this mind stretching activity? Yes. TWINKIES.



RWW spoke with several developers and captured what they are taking away from the sessions. The variation in attendance of sessions also provided a quick data point on what is the hot topic for all developers and what might be more niche.



For example, a great many discussions started with the words "porting from iPhone to" and "moving from Objective-C to C++". Another common refrain from developers was the hope that Intel will create a social element for the consumer interface of AppUp.



On the topic of application review, Intel indicated it would be outsourcing the vetting of applications to an external third party company. Essentially, Intel is expecting the flow of diversity to preclude having the right mix and numbers of Intel full time staff in place for that scenario. This third party approach also means Intel is trying to avoid prior examples of queue concerns with other app marketplaces.



During discussions of where AppUp might be available to consumers, Intel was cautious in naming names of high profile projects outside of Intel. Namely, while the Cisco Cius was used in most of the screenshots and there were numerous references to Google TV, Intel did not comment specifically on the availability of AppUp for these platforms.



Engage!



At a developer oriented conference you'll come across coding, shop talk, and all manner of geek speak. Intel AppUp did not lack in that area. What was more telling and indicative of the desire for more than just the code is the overflowing rooms that didn't bring up code once.



One example of a glimpse into the other side of app developer communities was the "Getting Consumers Engaged with Your Apps". As one attendee said "you have a limited amount of time in a day" to engage. The panel for was composed of Frank Gruber of Tech Cocktail, Xavier Lanier of notebooks.com, Daniel Odio of Pointabout Inc, and John Bergquist of Soma Games and The Code Monkeys.



Each panelist had a different take on what really matters and how best to approach the goal of getting consumers to care about your app. Suggestions tended to tip and tricks such as making videos and applying mechanical turk for SEO value to using Facebook and Linkedin to search out key influencers.



Departing from the tips and tricks flow, Frank Gruber hammered on why "hustle" matters when you are building up your apps. Gruber's point was the emphasis on staying as real time as possible to move quickly so that you immediately discover what works and more importantly -- what does not work if you try any of these tips and tricks. This should be familiar to anyone that has applied iterative approaches to code development and here Gruber challenged app developers to apply this outside of only the coding side of app development. Later Gruber summarized this as giving your app a "heartbeat" so that consumers know you are a real person or a vibrant app developer that is interested in being engaged.



Post Diet Mt. Dew Quotes



In speaking with Taylor Brown and Jesse Mecham of YouNeedABudget.com, an Adobe AIR shop, the following phrases were shared:



"I am glad to see how much Intel is behind this. This is a genuinely large initiative. We want to be in front of more eyeballs and Intel is committed to enabling that for app developers."



"The tangible dates shared for availability by the retailers were a pleasant surprise. This is about the hardware and retail side coming together finally. It's bigger than we thought."





In keeping with the multi-platform theme, Rovio is bullish on the things heard at the AppUp event. In speaking with Ville Heijari he shared the following:



"Expect the world of Angry Birds to get much much larger"





On the international front, developers with audiences in Japan, China and Europe such as Uwe Maurer of Ambient Design LTD based in New Zealand shared the following:



"AppUp will make it easier for us to reach new customers on emerging netbooks with pen, touch, and multi-touch capabilities for our natural media paint software, ArtRage 3 Studio"



Coder Challenge: 7 Kinds of Awesome





There were 7 teams on the Coder Challenge. Easy DICOM Viewer, MTAR, M-Power, VR Aquarium, Little Fingers, Trillion Ball and Gazelle.



Winners received $2000 each and a brand new netbook!



Keynote from Peter Biddle: We Can Do Better Than This



Peter Biddle opened the conference and said that all the secrets would be revealed during the final keynote. Biddle did not disappoint.



After a short Pong story (you had to be there!) and observations on the how "We can do better than this" theme he launched into the vision of AppUp and how it will fundamentally alter the scale and expectations of the apps marketplace mode. Biddle went on to outline how and why AppUp is going to address 5 key points.




  • Platform Sexiness

  • API Volume

  • Money and Recognition

  • Low Friction Deployment

  • Validation? Boring!



In short, Intel AppUp aspires to give your app a face, a community, a path and a venue to be discovered and consumed easily. If you are a musician this might sound familiar to you. You've heard "rock star" developer before but the notion of being in a sea of developers in an even larger sea of apps might start to draw the parallel between app developers and musicians.



Unfindable, unsearchable, and unreachable are the things AppUp intends to knock down. Finding the signal in the noise is where Biddle hit stride in the talk. By relating the feedback he assembled from each session he listened to and then consolidating that feedback for the keynote, he got heads nodding. The building of partners through tools and processes is what makes the curators a real and viable aspect of the vision. Take any Top 10 X blog posts and you'll begin to see what driving back to apps could mean if that blog is using AppUp open systems.



Biddle asked "How we did" of the crowd and all hands went up on the awesome scale. Considering that this was the first Intel AppUp Elements event the Oprah moment for 2011 is that all 2010 attendees get free comp badge for Intel AppUp Elements 2011!



Update: Day 2 is still going and we will provide updates in semi-real time!



Disclosure: Intel is a sponsor of ReadWriteWeb.












(Editor’s note: Megan Jones is a Director at Hadley Partners. A modified version of this story appeared on the company’s blog.)


For any industry in which scale is important – especially ones like media or consumer technology – consolidation concerns should be top of mind. Winning over a customer that’s dominated by a better-funded and more established company can be a losing proposition.


That’s why it’s often smart to seize an advantage early on once the winds of M&A begin blowing.


As a tech banker in Menlo Park, I saw a lot of consolidations early in my career. Recently, in discussions with a number of companies, I’ve heard potential acquirers are beginning to lurk nearby once more – even around businesses that have no interest in selling.


These companies are in industries that some people might think were still in the thick of a growth phase, which raises the question: Why do emerging industries sometimes evolve quickly into consolidating ones? I’ve got a few ideas…


1. Emerging industries that get press and attention tend to those that grow quickly. They also have large markets, attract talented people, have multiple and iterative stages of evolution and scale. All of those factors enable easier funding – either from business partners or venture capitalists.


2. Sometimes, as a result, those industries get over funded – with multiple VC firms each owning a similar company. All of those heavily funded companies then slug it out in a battle royale to win market share.


3. New industries or business segments are hard to build. Business models are often based on precedent – industries that targeted similar customers and monetized in related ways. In other words, you guess a lot, hopefully making reasoned guesses. A lot of mistakes are made (and some companies blow up) as a workable business model develops through trial and error. (Google, for example, wasn’t the first search engine.)


4. To build market share faster, some companies wisely merge. This action can enable economies of scale, a better customer experience (more offerings; better geographical reach; better or deeper management team) and add audience/customers. If the market conditions are right, the merger could create an entity that’s large enough to go public; thereby becoming better funded than its competitors.


5. The market can only support so many like companies – and other competitors in the sector realize it’s better to sell what’s left of a beaten company – and sieze some value from what you’ve built, rather than none.


6. Buying something (capacity; products; customers; geographies) takes less time and money than developing it. This factor can also lead to larger public companies buying into a new and emerging sector.


7. Selling late in the consolidation stage is often not as lucrative as selling early. The first companies to be acquired typically get more resources to build their presence in the industry, giving them an advantage (and making it more challenging for those that remain independent). The holdouts need to execute flawlessly in order to maintain any early leadership position they have.


8. VCs may push for a sale to ensure that their portfolio company partners with other stronger sector players, ensuring they get a good return.


Previous Story: RockYou spreads its “Deal of the Day” to other Facebook game makers




Google New: It&#39;s Google <b>News</b> About New Google Stuff In One Place

In terms of blog networks, no one ever seems to talk about Google, but they actually have one of the biggest. The search giant has well over 100 blogs devoted to everything from general company news to niche things that only webmasters ...

Chemical industry <b>news</b>

Previously you would have found the latest Chemical Industry News from our news server site. Acquisitions, mergers, share prices, new chemical industry trading…

Small Business <b>News</b>: The Times They Are A Changing

In the 60's it was a song of revolution when change was just not as common. Today, it reflects a fact of life, at least for small business owners and.


robert shumake

Google New: It&#39;s Google <b>News</b> About New Google Stuff In One Place

In terms of blog networks, no one ever seems to talk about Google, but they actually have one of the biggest. The search giant has well over 100 blogs devoted to everything from general company news to niche things that only webmasters ...

Chemical industry <b>news</b>

Previously you would have found the latest Chemical Industry News from our news server site. Acquisitions, mergers, share prices, new chemical industry trading…

Small Business <b>News</b>: The Times They Are A Changing

In the 60's it was a song of revolution when change was just not as common. Today, it reflects a fact of life, at least for small business owners and.










Rock Out with Your Blocks Out



The Stretch Your Mind track was aptly named. Sessions ranged from panels on netbook consumer behavior to security to in depth development platform reviews for Adobe AIR and MeeGo SDK. The power behind all of this mind stretching activity? Yes. TWINKIES.



RWW spoke with several developers and captured what they are taking away from the sessions. The variation in attendance of sessions also provided a quick data point on what is the hot topic for all developers and what might be more niche.



For example, a great many discussions started with the words "porting from iPhone to" and "moving from Objective-C to C++". Another common refrain from developers was the hope that Intel will create a social element for the consumer interface of AppUp.



On the topic of application review, Intel indicated it would be outsourcing the vetting of applications to an external third party company. Essentially, Intel is expecting the flow of diversity to preclude having the right mix and numbers of Intel full time staff in place for that scenario. This third party approach also means Intel is trying to avoid prior examples of queue concerns with other app marketplaces.



During discussions of where AppUp might be available to consumers, Intel was cautious in naming names of high profile projects outside of Intel. Namely, while the Cisco Cius was used in most of the screenshots and there were numerous references to Google TV, Intel did not comment specifically on the availability of AppUp for these platforms.



Engage!



At a developer oriented conference you'll come across coding, shop talk, and all manner of geek speak. Intel AppUp did not lack in that area. What was more telling and indicative of the desire for more than just the code is the overflowing rooms that didn't bring up code once.



One example of a glimpse into the other side of app developer communities was the "Getting Consumers Engaged with Your Apps". As one attendee said "you have a limited amount of time in a day" to engage. The panel for was composed of Frank Gruber of Tech Cocktail, Xavier Lanier of notebooks.com, Daniel Odio of Pointabout Inc, and John Bergquist of Soma Games and The Code Monkeys.



Each panelist had a different take on what really matters and how best to approach the goal of getting consumers to care about your app. Suggestions tended to tip and tricks such as making videos and applying mechanical turk for SEO value to using Facebook and Linkedin to search out key influencers.



Departing from the tips and tricks flow, Frank Gruber hammered on why "hustle" matters when you are building up your apps. Gruber's point was the emphasis on staying as real time as possible to move quickly so that you immediately discover what works and more importantly -- what does not work if you try any of these tips and tricks. This should be familiar to anyone that has applied iterative approaches to code development and here Gruber challenged app developers to apply this outside of only the coding side of app development. Later Gruber summarized this as giving your app a "heartbeat" so that consumers know you are a real person or a vibrant app developer that is interested in being engaged.



Post Diet Mt. Dew Quotes



In speaking with Taylor Brown and Jesse Mecham of YouNeedABudget.com, an Adobe AIR shop, the following phrases were shared:



"I am glad to see how much Intel is behind this. This is a genuinely large initiative. We want to be in front of more eyeballs and Intel is committed to enabling that for app developers."



"The tangible dates shared for availability by the retailers were a pleasant surprise. This is about the hardware and retail side coming together finally. It's bigger than we thought."





In keeping with the multi-platform theme, Rovio is bullish on the things heard at the AppUp event. In speaking with Ville Heijari he shared the following:



"Expect the world of Angry Birds to get much much larger"





On the international front, developers with audiences in Japan, China and Europe such as Uwe Maurer of Ambient Design LTD based in New Zealand shared the following:



"AppUp will make it easier for us to reach new customers on emerging netbooks with pen, touch, and multi-touch capabilities for our natural media paint software, ArtRage 3 Studio"



Coder Challenge: 7 Kinds of Awesome





There were 7 teams on the Coder Challenge. Easy DICOM Viewer, MTAR, M-Power, VR Aquarium, Little Fingers, Trillion Ball and Gazelle.



Winners received $2000 each and a brand new netbook!



Keynote from Peter Biddle: We Can Do Better Than This



Peter Biddle opened the conference and said that all the secrets would be revealed during the final keynote. Biddle did not disappoint.



After a short Pong story (you had to be there!) and observations on the how "We can do better than this" theme he launched into the vision of AppUp and how it will fundamentally alter the scale and expectations of the apps marketplace mode. Biddle went on to outline how and why AppUp is going to address 5 key points.




  • Platform Sexiness

  • API Volume

  • Money and Recognition

  • Low Friction Deployment

  • Validation? Boring!



In short, Intel AppUp aspires to give your app a face, a community, a path and a venue to be discovered and consumed easily. If you are a musician this might sound familiar to you. You've heard "rock star" developer before but the notion of being in a sea of developers in an even larger sea of apps might start to draw the parallel between app developers and musicians.



Unfindable, unsearchable, and unreachable are the things AppUp intends to knock down. Finding the signal in the noise is where Biddle hit stride in the talk. By relating the feedback he assembled from each session he listened to and then consolidating that feedback for the keynote, he got heads nodding. The building of partners through tools and processes is what makes the curators a real and viable aspect of the vision. Take any Top 10 X blog posts and you'll begin to see what driving back to apps could mean if that blog is using AppUp open systems.



Biddle asked "How we did" of the crowd and all hands went up on the awesome scale. Considering that this was the first Intel AppUp Elements event the Oprah moment for 2011 is that all 2010 attendees get free comp badge for Intel AppUp Elements 2011!



Update: Day 2 is still going and we will provide updates in semi-real time!



Disclosure: Intel is a sponsor of ReadWriteWeb.












(Editor’s note: Megan Jones is a Director at Hadley Partners. A modified version of this story appeared on the company’s blog.)


For any industry in which scale is important – especially ones like media or consumer technology – consolidation concerns should be top of mind. Winning over a customer that’s dominated by a better-funded and more established company can be a losing proposition.


That’s why it’s often smart to seize an advantage early on once the winds of M&A begin blowing.


As a tech banker in Menlo Park, I saw a lot of consolidations early in my career. Recently, in discussions with a number of companies, I’ve heard potential acquirers are beginning to lurk nearby once more – even around businesses that have no interest in selling.


These companies are in industries that some people might think were still in the thick of a growth phase, which raises the question: Why do emerging industries sometimes evolve quickly into consolidating ones? I’ve got a few ideas…


1. Emerging industries that get press and attention tend to those that grow quickly. They also have large markets, attract talented people, have multiple and iterative stages of evolution and scale. All of those factors enable easier funding – either from business partners or venture capitalists.


2. Sometimes, as a result, those industries get over funded – with multiple VC firms each owning a similar company. All of those heavily funded companies then slug it out in a battle royale to win market share.


3. New industries or business segments are hard to build. Business models are often based on precedent – industries that targeted similar customers and monetized in related ways. In other words, you guess a lot, hopefully making reasoned guesses. A lot of mistakes are made (and some companies blow up) as a workable business model develops through trial and error. (Google, for example, wasn’t the first search engine.)


4. To build market share faster, some companies wisely merge. This action can enable economies of scale, a better customer experience (more offerings; better geographical reach; better or deeper management team) and add audience/customers. If the market conditions are right, the merger could create an entity that’s large enough to go public; thereby becoming better funded than its competitors.


5. The market can only support so many like companies – and other competitors in the sector realize it’s better to sell what’s left of a beaten company – and sieze some value from what you’ve built, rather than none.


6. Buying something (capacity; products; customers; geographies) takes less time and money than developing it. This factor can also lead to larger public companies buying into a new and emerging sector.


7. Selling late in the consolidation stage is often not as lucrative as selling early. The first companies to be acquired typically get more resources to build their presence in the industry, giving them an advantage (and making it more challenging for those that remain independent). The holdouts need to execute flawlessly in order to maintain any early leadership position they have.


8. VCs may push for a sale to ensure that their portfolio company partners with other stronger sector players, ensuring they get a good return.


Previous Story: RockYou spreads its “Deal of the Day” to other Facebook game makers





Cash Keywords Community Toolbar by Conduit_Connect


robert shumake

Google New: It&#39;s Google <b>News</b> About New Google Stuff In One Place

In terms of blog networks, no one ever seems to talk about Google, but they actually have one of the biggest. The search giant has well over 100 blogs devoted to everything from general company news to niche things that only webmasters ...

Chemical industry <b>news</b>

Previously you would have found the latest Chemical Industry News from our news server site. Acquisitions, mergers, share prices, new chemical industry trading…

Small Business <b>News</b>: The Times They Are A Changing

In the 60's it was a song of revolution when change was just not as common. Today, it reflects a fact of life, at least for small business owners and.


robert shumake

Google New: It&#39;s Google <b>News</b> About New Google Stuff In One Place

In terms of blog networks, no one ever seems to talk about Google, but they actually have one of the biggest. The search giant has well over 100 blogs devoted to everything from general company news to niche things that only webmasters ...

Chemical industry <b>news</b>

Previously you would have found the latest Chemical Industry News from our news server site. Acquisitions, mergers, share prices, new chemical industry trading…

Small Business <b>News</b>: The Times They Are A Changing

In the 60's it was a song of revolution when change was just not as common. Today, it reflects a fact of life, at least for small business owners and.

















Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Making Money Scams


The magic of the free market and the wisdom of our Wall Street producers/betters at work:



Earlier this year I wrote about the Jefferson County story in a piece called “Looting Main Street” in Rolling Stone. In this tale employees of a group of high-powered Wall Street banks, led in particular by JP Morgan Chase, funneled money to local politicians in Alabama, who in turn signed off on toxic interest-rate swap deals that left the county saddled with monstrous debt for a generation.



Jefferson County is essentially the world’s worst credit card story. The local pols ran up massive bills to build a “Taj Mahal of sewer-treatment plants,” then saddled future voters with a blizzard-worth of rate hikes, punitive fees and late charges. Alabamans who should have paid $250 million for their new sewer system now owe over $3 billion, thanks to their corrupt politicians and the greedy carpetbagger banks who dragged these local hicks into deadly derivative deals.



These types of finance scams are the template for a whole new type of symbiotic relationship between politicians and the financial services industry: deals like the JeffCo interest-rate swaps allow politicians to borrow vast sums essentially without immediate consequence, making it possible to green-light politically-popular programs during their terms but leaving future leaders holding the bag when the bills come due. We saw similar stories in Greece and in the Denver school system; hundreds of communities in Italy and other European countries are also experiencing similar debt-blowups thanks to rate swaps and other deadly deals.



Anyway, back in the mid-nineties, the average sewer bill for a Jefferson County family of four was only $14.71. By the time I wrote my story earlier this year, most citizens were paying about four times that amount – and as of this summer, the average JeffCo sewer bill was $63. Well, the news now comes out that rates will go up again, and in the best case scenario they will jump 25% a year. The worst case? Jefferson County sewer rates could jump as much as 527%, with some estimates placing the average monthly bill as high as $395 a month.



At some point, people are going to figure out that our current corrupt capitalist system isn’t about the efficient allocation of capital, but straight up robbery and thieving. Not any time soon, I suspect, but some day.








The magic of the free market and the wisdom of our Wall Street producers/betters at work:



Earlier this year I wrote about the Jefferson County story in a piece called “Looting Main Street” in Rolling Stone. In this tale employees of a group of high-powered Wall Street banks, led in particular by JP Morgan Chase, funneled money to local politicians in Alabama, who in turn signed off on toxic interest-rate swap deals that left the county saddled with monstrous debt for a generation.



Jefferson County is essentially the world’s worst credit card story. The local pols ran up massive bills to build a “Taj Mahal of sewer-treatment plants,” then saddled future voters with a blizzard-worth of rate hikes, punitive fees and late charges. Alabamans who should have paid $250 million for their new sewer system now owe over $3 billion, thanks to their corrupt politicians and the greedy carpetbagger banks who dragged these local hicks into deadly derivative deals.



These types of finance scams are the template for a whole new type of symbiotic relationship between politicians and the financial services industry: deals like the JeffCo interest-rate swaps allow politicians to borrow vast sums essentially without immediate consequence, making it possible to green-light politically-popular programs during their terms but leaving future leaders holding the bag when the bills come due. We saw similar stories in Greece and in the Denver school system; hundreds of communities in Italy and other European countries are also experiencing similar debt-blowups thanks to rate swaps and other deadly deals.



Anyway, back in the mid-nineties, the average sewer bill for a Jefferson County family of four was only $14.71. By the time I wrote my story earlier this year, most citizens were paying about four times that amount – and as of this summer, the average JeffCo sewer bill was $63. Well, the news now comes out that rates will go up again, and in the best case scenario they will jump 25% a year. The worst case? Jefferson County sewer rates could jump as much as 527%, with some estimates placing the average monthly bill as high as $395 a month.



At some point, people are going to figure out that our current corrupt capitalist system isn’t about the efficient allocation of capital, but straight up robbery and thieving. Not any time soon, I suspect, but some day.








Chemical industry <b>news</b>

Previously you would have found the latest Chemical Industry News from our news server site. Acquisitions, mergers, share prices, new chemical industry trading…

More People Watched Fox <b>News</b> Monday Than Obama Town Hall <b>...</b>

In fact, far more people watched the Fox News Channel's "Happening Now" with Jon Scott and Jenna Lee airing at the same time than tuned in to see what the President had to say. Potentially even more embarrassing, when you add in those ...

Photo of the Week: iPhone 3GS in Brazil | iLounge <b>News</b>

iLounge news discussing the Photo of the Week: iPhone 3GS in Brazil. Find more Site News news from leading independent iPod, iPhone, and iPad site.


robert shumake

Chemical industry <b>news</b>

Previously you would have found the latest Chemical Industry News from our news server site. Acquisitions, mergers, share prices, new chemical industry trading…

More People Watched Fox <b>News</b> Monday Than Obama Town Hall <b>...</b>

In fact, far more people watched the Fox News Channel's "Happening Now" with Jon Scott and Jenna Lee airing at the same time than tuned in to see what the President had to say. Potentially even more embarrassing, when you add in those ...

Photo of the Week: iPhone 3GS in Brazil | iLounge <b>News</b>

iLounge news discussing the Photo of the Week: iPhone 3GS in Brazil. Find more Site News news from leading independent iPod, iPhone, and iPad site.



The magic of the free market and the wisdom of our Wall Street producers/betters at work:



Earlier this year I wrote about the Jefferson County story in a piece called “Looting Main Street” in Rolling Stone. In this tale employees of a group of high-powered Wall Street banks, led in particular by JP Morgan Chase, funneled money to local politicians in Alabama, who in turn signed off on toxic interest-rate swap deals that left the county saddled with monstrous debt for a generation.



Jefferson County is essentially the world’s worst credit card story. The local pols ran up massive bills to build a “Taj Mahal of sewer-treatment plants,” then saddled future voters with a blizzard-worth of rate hikes, punitive fees and late charges. Alabamans who should have paid $250 million for their new sewer system now owe over $3 billion, thanks to their corrupt politicians and the greedy carpetbagger banks who dragged these local hicks into deadly derivative deals.



These types of finance scams are the template for a whole new type of symbiotic relationship between politicians and the financial services industry: deals like the JeffCo interest-rate swaps allow politicians to borrow vast sums essentially without immediate consequence, making it possible to green-light politically-popular programs during their terms but leaving future leaders holding the bag when the bills come due. We saw similar stories in Greece and in the Denver school system; hundreds of communities in Italy and other European countries are also experiencing similar debt-blowups thanks to rate swaps and other deadly deals.



Anyway, back in the mid-nineties, the average sewer bill for a Jefferson County family of four was only $14.71. By the time I wrote my story earlier this year, most citizens were paying about four times that amount – and as of this summer, the average JeffCo sewer bill was $63. Well, the news now comes out that rates will go up again, and in the best case scenario they will jump 25% a year. The worst case? Jefferson County sewer rates could jump as much as 527%, with some estimates placing the average monthly bill as high as $395 a month.



At some point, people are going to figure out that our current corrupt capitalist system isn’t about the efficient allocation of capital, but straight up robbery and thieving. Not any time soon, I suspect, but some day.








The magic of the free market and the wisdom of our Wall Street producers/betters at work:



Earlier this year I wrote about the Jefferson County story in a piece called “Looting Main Street” in Rolling Stone. In this tale employees of a group of high-powered Wall Street banks, led in particular by JP Morgan Chase, funneled money to local politicians in Alabama, who in turn signed off on toxic interest-rate swap deals that left the county saddled with monstrous debt for a generation.



Jefferson County is essentially the world’s worst credit card story. The local pols ran up massive bills to build a “Taj Mahal of sewer-treatment plants,” then saddled future voters with a blizzard-worth of rate hikes, punitive fees and late charges. Alabamans who should have paid $250 million for their new sewer system now owe over $3 billion, thanks to their corrupt politicians and the greedy carpetbagger banks who dragged these local hicks into deadly derivative deals.



These types of finance scams are the template for a whole new type of symbiotic relationship between politicians and the financial services industry: deals like the JeffCo interest-rate swaps allow politicians to borrow vast sums essentially without immediate consequence, making it possible to green-light politically-popular programs during their terms but leaving future leaders holding the bag when the bills come due. We saw similar stories in Greece and in the Denver school system; hundreds of communities in Italy and other European countries are also experiencing similar debt-blowups thanks to rate swaps and other deadly deals.



Anyway, back in the mid-nineties, the average sewer bill for a Jefferson County family of four was only $14.71. By the time I wrote my story earlier this year, most citizens were paying about four times that amount – and as of this summer, the average JeffCo sewer bill was $63. Well, the news now comes out that rates will go up again, and in the best case scenario they will jump 25% a year. The worst case? Jefferson County sewer rates could jump as much as 527%, with some estimates placing the average monthly bill as high as $395 a month.



At some point, people are going to figure out that our current corrupt capitalist system isn’t about the efficient allocation of capital, but straight up robbery and thieving. Not any time soon, I suspect, but some day.









imelite IM ELITE Reviews Reviewed SCAM membership alex shelton george brown facebook bonus review launch internet marketing make money online business strategy my by IM Elite Review


robert shumake

Chemical industry <b>news</b>

Previously you would have found the latest Chemical Industry News from our news server site. Acquisitions, mergers, share prices, new chemical industry trading…

More People Watched Fox <b>News</b> Monday Than Obama Town Hall <b>...</b>

In fact, far more people watched the Fox News Channel's "Happening Now" with Jon Scott and Jenna Lee airing at the same time than tuned in to see what the President had to say. Potentially even more embarrassing, when you add in those ...

Photo of the Week: iPhone 3GS in Brazil | iLounge <b>News</b>

iLounge news discussing the Photo of the Week: iPhone 3GS in Brazil. Find more Site News news from leading independent iPod, iPhone, and iPad site.


robert shumake

Chemical industry <b>news</b>

Previously you would have found the latest Chemical Industry News from our news server site. Acquisitions, mergers, share prices, new chemical industry trading…

More People Watched Fox <b>News</b> Monday Than Obama Town Hall <b>...</b>

In fact, far more people watched the Fox News Channel's "Happening Now" with Jon Scott and Jenna Lee airing at the same time than tuned in to see what the President had to say. Potentially even more embarrassing, when you add in those ...

Photo of the Week: iPhone 3GS in Brazil | iLounge <b>News</b>

iLounge news discussing the Photo of the Week: iPhone 3GS in Brazil. Find more Site News news from leading independent iPod, iPhone, and iPad site.